1% of Tokens Can Be Enough: On Gradient Estimation in On-Policy Distillation
Abstract
Sparse on-policy distillation (OPD) allocates teacher supervision to a small subset of tokens in student-generated trajectories. However, useful teacher guidance can yield a noisy update when its gradient is estimated from a sampled next token. We study this estimation problem at a fixed prefix in information geometry and propose an information-efficiency ratio (IER) based on a signal-to-noise decomposition. IER characterizes relative gradient estimation error under an optimal scalar baseline. A candidate-set approximation enables token selection based on IER and its combination with existing usefulness scores, while retaining the sampled reverse-KL training objective. On mathematical and medical reasoning tasks, adding IER improves existing selectors in multiple settings, with sparse configurations matching or exceeding full OPD without token selection at small token budgets of 0.1\%--1\%. These results support accounting for both usefulness and gradient-estimation reliability when allocating sparse supervision. Our code is available at https://github.com/BruceSheng1202/IER-OPD.
Community
Sparse on-policy distillation (OPD) allocates teacher supervision to a small subset of tokens in student-generated trajectories. However, useful teacher guidance can yield a noisy update when its gradient is estimated from a sampled next token. We study this estimation problem at a fixed prefix in information geometry and propose an information-efficiency ratio (IER) based on a signal-to-noise decomposition. IER characterizes relative gradient estimation error under an optimal scalar baseline. A candidate-set approximation enables token selection based on IER and its combination with existing usefulness scores, while retaining the sampled reverse-KL training objective. On mathematical and medical reasoning tasks, adding IER improves existing selectors in multiple settings, with sparse configurations matching or exceeding full OPD without token selection at small token budgets of 0.1%--1%. These results support accounting for both usefulness and gradient-estimation reliability when allocating sparse supervision. Our code is available at https://github.com/BruceSheng1202/IER-OPD.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- A Token-Level Analysis of Sampled-Token Reverse-KL On-Policy Distillation (2026)
- Beyond Token-Local Imitation: Reward-Compatible Temporal Credit Assignment for On-Policy Distillation (2026)
- Does On-Policy Distillation Really Distill? From Noisy Teacher to Self-Improvement (2026)
- On-policy Distillation with Verifiable Reward (2026)
- Tail-Aware Top-$k$ On-Policy Distillation (2026)
- Extremely Sparse Supervision Incentivizes Reasoning Ability (2026)
- SPOT: Sparse Probing and Outcome Calibration for On-Policy Distillation (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2609.24432 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper